Hougen 0904101 Drill
- Drill
- 6 amps
- Corded electric
- 34.9 pounds
- Better rated than 93%
The size, low RPM and amperage point to a serious metalworking drill, though buyers should confirm the power source detail directly given the conflicting listing data.
As an Amazon Associate, ProductDome may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through links on this page.
How it ranks among the 369 drills we track
4.8★ across 110 Amazon ratings, Bayesian-smoothed toward the category average.
110 Amazon ratings, weighted on a log scale so huge counts don't drown everything.
Modest tracked demand last month.
Brand identity, imagery, description and spec coverage.
The ProductDome score is separate from the Amazon rating shown above: it combines the Bayesian-smoothed Amazon rating with evidence volume, tracked demand, and data quality across the 369 drills we track - how the scorecard works · full drills data report. Confidence: medium - useful but incomplete evidence.Last refreshed Aug 4, 2026. Data-computed, not a hands-on test. Compiled by the ProductDome Research Team.
Overview
The Hougen 0904101 is a heavy-duty drill weighing 34.9 pounds, built around a 115 volt, 6 amp motor turning at 450 RPM. The weight and low speed point to an industrial metalworking drill rather than a handheld unit.
At just under 35 pounds and running at a fixed 450 RPM, this reads as a stationary or magnetic-base drill meant for metal fabrication rather than a portable handheld model. The listing's power source field is inconsistent with the given voltage and amperage, so it has been left out here rather than repeated as stated.
- 450 RPM fixed speed
- 115 volt, 6 amp electrical rating
- Weighs 34.9 pounds
- Dimensions 11.62 in L x 7.75 in W x 18 in H
Who it's for
Metalworkers and fabricators needing a heavy, low-speed drill for controlled hole-making in metal will find the weight and RPM consistent with that use. Anyone wanting a light handheld drill for wood or general DIY work should look elsewhere given the 34.9 pound weight.
Strengths and trade-offs
Drawn from this product's published specifications.
- Low 450 RPM suited to controlled metal drilling
- Substantial build weight of 34.9 pounds for stability
- Listed power source conflicts with the given voltage and amperage
- Too heavy for handheld or portable use
- No bit or chuck capacity listed
Performance notes
A 450 RPM top speed is low compared to general-purpose drills, which typically points to a tool designed for controlled cutting through metal with larger bits rather than fast general drilling. The 115 volt, 6 amp electrical rating and 34.9 pound weight both support a stationary or base-mounted design rather than a handheld one.
Specifications
| Brand | Hougen |
|---|---|
| Model | 0904101 |
| Dimensions & fit | |
| Item Weight | 34.9 pounds |
| Dimensions | 11.6 × 7.8 × 18 inches |
| Capacity & performance | |
| Speed | 450 rpm |
| Power & efficiency | |
| Amperage | 6 amps |
| Power Source | Corded electric |
| Voltage | 115 volts |
Other Hougen drills
How it compares
This product against the closest alternatives we track in drills.
| Product | Amazon rating | Ratings | ProductDome score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hougen 0904101 DrillThis product | 4.8 / 5 | 110 | 3.8 / 5 |
| AVID CD316-20 DrillAVID | 4.6 / 5 | 23,200 | 4.6 / 5 |
| SKIL SD561801 DrillSkil | 4.7 / 5 | 11,399 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Hi-Spec DT30317R-CA DrillHi-Spec | 4.4 / 5 | 14,822 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Fanttik E1 Max DrillFanttik | 4.5 / 5 | 7,298 | 4.5 / 5 |
Similar drills from other brands
Questions about the Hougen 0904101
Common buyer questions answered straight from the product spec data - no fluff, no "it depends".
Is the Hougen 0904101 a handheld drill?
No, at 34.9 pounds and with a fixed 450 RPM speed it reads as a stationary or base-mounted drill for metalworking rather than a handheld tool.
What is the drill's electrical rating?
It is listed at 115 volts and 6 amps.
Why doesn't the listing state the power source clearly?
The attribute data lists a power source that conflicts with the given voltage and amperage, so that detail was left out here rather than repeated as stated.